
This photograph, taken in 1950 by Nina Leen, is called
The Irascibles.
Irascible |iˈrasəbəl|adjective(of a person) easily made angry.• characterized by or arising from anger : their rebukes got progressively more irascible.The Irascibles are as follows:
Willem De Kooning;Jackson Pollock;Adolph Gottlieb;Ad Reinhardt;Robert Motherwell;Clyfford Still;James C. Brooks;Hedda Sterne;Jimmy Ernst;Bradley Walker Tomlin;Richard Pousette-Dart;Barnett Newman;Theodoros Stamos;William Baziotes;Mark Rothko
Eight of these artists are featured in our upcoming exhibition, AUSPICIOUS VISION: Edward Wales Root and American Modernism (Aug. 23-Nov. 29, 2009). But why were they dubbed "irascible"?
Most of these artists lived what could best be described as tumultuous lives. Pollock was dead by 44. Rothko committed suicide in 1970. Ernst's mother was sent to her death at Auschwitz. It's somewhat amazing that De Kooning, who was a legendary alcoholic, lived into his early 90's.
Troubled yes, but irascible? Perhaps. Notice that not one of these artists has anything close to a smile on their faces. You can almost feel that the moment after the photo was taken, they broke apart like shrapnel from a mine, each loner going their own direction.
Art, for this group anyway, was not a team sport. They certainly liked to talk and drink and spend time together, but collaboration was not in the cards. That would change a bit in the following years with the likes of Jasper Johns and Robert Rauschenberg, but not much.
Although this was a "group" photograph, the reason for the artists' particapation was mostly in self-interest. That same year, these artists, along with 14 others, signed a letter to the president of the Met in New York, basically complaining that the museum's view of contemporary art left most of the absract expressionists out in the cold. They wanted in. The protest caused enough stir to interest Life magazine (where this photo first appeared), but the changes did not come swiftly.
A few years later, in 1953, The Met displayed 134 contemporary works from the private collection of Edward Wales Root. But it wasn't until The Met's 1969 exhibition,
New York Painting and Sculpture: 1940-1970, curated by the amazing Henry Geldzahler
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Geldzahler, that the museum made a real entrance into the world of contemporary art (even though some of it was already decades old). This was 19 years after the "Irascibles" gathered for this photograph. 4 of the artists were already dead by 1969. Several others would be within 5 years.
Many of us look at these pieces now and think, "Why wouldn't anyone see the value in this?" But there was a time, not too long ago, when dripping paint on a canvas or painting three bars of color seemed like the antithesis to "real" art. Doesn't that make you a little irascible?